Dating line phone trial msn top dating websites

And as I mentioned that is going to be the toughest time when Mr. I know that there were times where every single person in here felt something deep down inside.The law gives us a guidance as to what we should do when it comes to emotion and that is your rules of deliberation, what the law is, is that this case must not be decided for or against anyone because you feel sorry for anyone or are angry at anyone.And that’s because, obviously, we want you to base your verdict on the evidence, not on emotion.And while there were times where emotion was directly pointed at you or things were done to draw into your emotion, to get you angry at something, to get you to discriminate against someone because they didn’t act the way they should have acted. The law says you must base your verdict on the evidence not on emotion.Here is a closing argument of defense counsel in a murder case. This is the hardest point for a defense lawyer because I can never come back up and respond. And while the defense did put on a case and they’ve put on evidence and testimony it was never required to do so.I, too, would like to thank you on behalf of the defense for the sacrifices you have made as citizens of the state of Florida. And I want to thank you both individually and collectively for that great sacrifice that you’ve all made. Here we are at the end of our journey and I have to tell you that I probably think you have more questions than you have answers. And the reason it’s done that way is because the state has the burden of proof here. They have the burden of beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt, which is the highest standard in American jurist prudence. And you’ll recall when I told you in the very beginning, when we did the jury selection I had the unique opportunity to speak to each and every one of you individually. We could’ve sat back and not questioned, not one single witness and did absolutely nothing throughout the course of this trial. Now I’d like to explain to you that this is my last opportunity to speak with you individually. Mason will then stand up and cover the jury instructions and the law and then I will have one last opportunity to speak with you but generally this is our moment.

And you all sat here and saw some bizarre things throughout the course of this trial. All of it, all of the discussion that came around with being irrelevant evidence ended up being posed as to the car.And I want to talk to you about it and explain why I feel that way. Ashton’s because I want to actually show you what I think the evidence showed. But it’s a guide for you to look at the evidence from a certain angle and a certain perspective. To show you we think this has a connection to this.Now you’re going to have to rely on your recollection of how the evidence was presented. We want you to pay attention to this fact because of this and came on later on and try and tie it and piece it together for you so you can look back and say, “Yes.And you will dishonor the law and even Caylee’s memory if you were to base your decision on anything but the evidence. And here’s the proof and Judge Perry will read that to you. Now back to what I was saying with their initial set up, the way the case was presented, the first couple of weeks.It is rule number three but I ask that you make this rule number one. And what was funny is I wanted you all to see something and you may have wondered why I asked certain questions. You see the strategy behind that is, is if you hate her, if you think she’s a lying no good slut then you’ll start to look at this evidence in a different light. Maybe I’m seeing something that’s not there.” And start to actually discriminate against her rather than give her the standard that is afforded to each and every citizen in our country.

Leave a Reply